Ring v. Ring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the parties’ failure to communicate and their continued hostility did not constitute a material change in circumstances
• holding fact that the parties failed to communicate and had continuing hostility does not constitute a material change in custody to warrant modification of custody
• holding fact that the parties failed to communicate and had continuing hostility does not constitute a material change in custody to warrant modification of custody
• the fact that the parties failed to communicate and had continuing hostility does not constitute a material change in custody to warrant modification of custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cooper v. Gress
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12· cited 40×
• Ragle v. Ragle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-15· cited 14×
• Sanchez v. Hernandez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-08· cited 13×
• Bazan v. Gambone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-05· cited 11×
• Yasar Korkmaz v. Anastasia Korkmaz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-04· cited 6×
• Johnson v. Adair
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-29· cited 4×
• Wade v. Hirschman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-08· cited 4×
• Bazan v. Gambone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-09· cited 2×
• ANNA HOLLIS v. DAVID HOLLIS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-19
• LYNETTE LOGREIRA v. EFRAIN LOGREIRA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-09-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gibbs v. Gibbs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-27· cited 41×
• Newsom v. Newsom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-28· cited 16×
• Blosser v. Blosser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-09· cited 14×