Skip to main content
· 11/15/1892

Ring v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 112 Mo. 220
  • 20 S.W. 436
  • 1892 Mo. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s argument that another inmate could have placed shank in defendant’s bag
  • it was within jury’s prerogative to choose which inference regarding constructive possession was most worthy of belief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacFarlane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.