· 11/15/1892
Ring v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
Citations
- 112 Mo. 220
- 20 S.W. 436
- 1892 Mo. LEXIS 210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting defendant’s argument that another inmate could have placed shank in defendant’s bag
- it was within jury’s prerogative to choose which inference regarding constructive possession was most worthy of belief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacFarlane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.