· 5/3/2006
Ring v. Employment Department
Citations
- 134 P.3d 1096
- 205 Or. App. 532
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing department 3 The parties do not dispute—and we agree—that this matter is properly before us. Given our disposition on the third assignment of error, the validity of the amended order is immaterial. Cite as 320 Or App 205 (2022
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.