Rines v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff “plausibly alleged 3 that he was performing his job satisfactorily” when the plaintiff alleged he received an “outstanding” 4 performance review and received a performance-based raise prior to his termination
• “[T]he replacement 17 of a slightly younger employee will not give rise to a successful ADEA claim. The 18 replacement must be substantially younger . . . . [A] ten-year age difference would be 19 considered substantial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).