Rinard v. Lincoln National Bank

Citations

• 17 Pa. Super. 584
• 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 361

Syllabus

<p>Promissory note — Evidence—Disputed question of fact — Review.</p> <p>In an action against a bank to recover the proceeds of a promissory note, a judgment and verdict for defendant will be sustained where the plaintiff' testifies positively that he left the note with the bank for the sole purpose of collection, and the president of the bank testifies that the note was left for collection under an agreement that the proceeds thereof should be applied to the payment of a note of a corporation to the bank upon which the plaintiff was indorser, and this disputed question of fact is the only question in the case.</p>