Court of Appeals of Virginia· 12/16/2008
Rinaldi v. Rinaldi
Citations
- 669 S.E.2d 359
- 53 Va. App. 61
- 2008 Va. App. LEXIS 540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Virginia’s laws do not require equal division of marital assets
- “‘It is the value that improvements add to the - 20 - property, not their cost, that is the proper consideration because the court is apportioning the equity in the hybrid property when it traces the sources of contributions to that property.’” (emphasis in original
- “‘It is the value that improvements add to the - 20 - property, not their cost, that is the proper consideration because the court is apportioning the equity in the hybrid property when it traces the sources of contributions to that property.’” (emphasis in original
- “‘It is the value that improvements add to the - 20 - property, not their cost, that is the proper consideration because the court is apportioning the equity in the hybrid property when it traces the sources of contributions to that property.’” (emphasis in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elder, Humphreys, Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.