Skip to main content
· 3/29/1911

Rimmerman v. United States

Citations

  • 186 F. 307
  • 108 C.C.A. 385
  • 1911 U.S. App. LEXIS 4113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exhaustion not required where it would have been “meaningless and superfluous”
  • implied action under Section 504 probable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Born, Hunger, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.