Riley v. United States Title Guaranty & Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no evidentiary deficit or improperly drawn medical conclusions where the ALJ’s RFC determination was more restrictive than the medical opinions in the record
• finding no “evidentiary deficit” where the ALJ partially relied on state agency consultants’ opinions but also incorporated additional limitations
• finding “no evidentiary deficit” where the ALJ partially relies on agency consultants’ opinions but incorporates additional limitations to account for a claimant’s subjective symptoms
• finding “no evidentiary deficit” where the ALJ partially relies on agency consultants’ opinions but incorporates additional limitations to account for a claimant’s subjective symptoms
• finding “no evidentiary deficit” where the ALJ partially relies on agency consultants’ opinions but incorporates additional limitations
• finding no “evidentiary deficit” where the ALJ partially relied on state agency opinion but also incorporated additional limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).