Riley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Public policy requires that an informer’s identity be protected unless the defendant shows that its disclosure would materially aid his defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Fred \Freddy Campo\ Campagnuolo, John \Jackie Campo\ Campagnuolo, and Michael \Mike Douglas\ Gougules
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-04-06· cited 129×
• United States v. Samuel John Passarella
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-04-17· cited 50×
• Renzi v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1974-05-01· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Todisco
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1973-04-05· cited 33×
• State v. Flowers
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1973-04-16· cited 25×
• Preston v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1975-05-12· cited 18×
• Butcher v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2006-08-17· cited 12×
• State v. Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-14· cited 5×
• McNulty v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1971-05-17· cited 4×
• Adams v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-09-13
• State v. Diggs
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-03-15