Riley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion by not relaxing Criminal Rule 25 where the defendants showed that they were unable to consult with an attorney to determine whether to exercise a peremptory challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Poland
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 109×
• Lomas Sr., R. v. Kravitz, J., Aplts.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-28· cited 61×
• Tunley v. Municipality of Anchorage School District
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-01-29· cited 23×
• Morgan v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-10-30· cited 18×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-08-17· cited 18×
• Cook v. Rowland
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2002-06-21· cited 16×
• Larson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-07-18· cited 14×
• Trudeau v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-02-14· cited 10×
• Washington v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-04-29· cited 8×
• Nevarez v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCracken v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-04-08· cited 48×
• Gieffels v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-07-23· cited 40×
• Pope v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1970-12-21· cited 38×