Skip to main content
· 2/27/1890

Riley v. Simpson

Citations

  • 83 Cal. 217
  • 23 P. 293
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the context in which a contractual term appears always must be considered in determining the meaning of the term
  • holding that looking to the dictionary for the definition of a term is a good start, “inasmuch as we generally accept that contractual terms cany their ordinary meanings, O.G.G.A. § 13-2-2(2
  • noting that parol evidence is admissible to explain all ambiguities, both latent and patent
  • noting that parol evidence is admissible to explain all ambiguities, both latent and patent
  • providing that contracts must be construed as a whole
  • providing that contracts must be construed as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.