Riley v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a conflicting explanation “is a matter for the jury, unless the explanation is unreasonable as a matter of law, or inherently incredible, or such that reasonable men could not differ as to its effect”
• a conflicting explanation “is a matter for the jury, unless the explanation is unreasonable as a matter of law, or inherently incredible or such that reasonable men could not differ as to its effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).