Riley v. Barge James Moriarity

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• WARN Act’s provisions concerning plant closings or mass layoffs are “not triggered” unless “fifty or more employees are affected at a ‘single site of employment.’”
• the WARN Act’s provisions concerning plant closing or mass layoffs are “not triggered” unless “fifty or more employees are affected at a ‘single site of employment.’” (emphasis added)
• issue was whether separate towboats on which plaintiffs lived during 30 day assignments or defendant's main office to which over 80% of the crews physically reported for assignments to towboats was single site of employment pursuant to 20 C.F.R. S 639.3(i)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).