Skip to main content
· 6/20/2013

Rihm v. Hancock County Public Library

Citations

  • 954 F. Supp. 2d 840
  • 2013 WL 3155491
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86707
  • 118 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the pro tanto approach because “it does not make sense to apply [the proportionate share approach] in cases where the non-settling defendant willfully defaulted by disregarding discovery obligations and impeded determination of liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.