Rigoni Di Asiago S.P.A. v. Mucci (In Re Mucci)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trademark infringement judgment constituted willful and malicious injury under section 523(a)(6)
• the court, citing In re Smith, stating that it “adopts the rationale of Smith that intentional copyright infringement is equivalent to an ‘intentional tort’ (probably most analogous here to a deliberate conversion) for Geiger purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).