Riggs v. Szymanski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proper view of plaintiffs verdict awarding no damages is that the plaintiff failed to prove proximate cause or any monetary loss
• “There can be no doubt that ... the court may amend the verdict, correcting manifest errors of form, and sometimes matters of substance, to make it conform to the intention of the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).