Skip to main content
· 8/3/1993

Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, DC v. Linch

Citations

  • 829 F. Supp. 163
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10840
  • 1993 WL 292533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ECOA violation cannot be asserted as affirmative defense
  • holding that ECOA violation cannot be asserted as affirmative defense
  • bank did not discriminate by requiring wife’s signature after determining that husband was not individually creditworthy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cacheris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.