Skip to main content
· 4/1/1947

Riggle v. Cincinnati Union Terminal

Citations

  • 71 F. Supp. 456
  • 19 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2579
  • 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between disclosure of “confidential information” and an official arrest record
  • “[T]he district court must balance the invasion of privacy alleged by [plaintiff] against any legitimate interests proven by the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Druffel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.