Skip to main content
· 10/29/1971

Riggins v. Brown

Citations

  • 21 C.M.A. 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Jurisdiction can only be exercised ... over cases in which appropriated funds can be obligated.\
  • financial self-sufficiency does not establish NAFI where historically appropriations were received and are allowed under the statute for the future
  • financial self-sufficiency does not establish NAFI where historically appropriations were received and are allowed under the statute for the future
  • Claims Court does not have jurisdiction over cases where contract sued upon cannot be satisfied out of appropriated funds
  • “Jurisdiction under the Tucker Act must be exercised absent a firm indication by Congress that it intended to absolve the appropriated funds of the United States from liability for acts of the Comptroller.”
  • \Jurisdiction under the Tucker Act must be exercised absent a firm indication by Congress that it intended to absolve the appropriated funds of the United States from liability for acts of the Comptroller.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.