· 10/29/1971
Riggins v. Brown
Citations
- 21 C.M.A. 662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Jurisdiction can only be exercised ... over cases in which appropriated funds can be obligated.\
- financial self-sufficiency does not establish NAFI where historically appropriations were received and are allowed under the statute for the future
- financial self-sufficiency does not establish NAFI where historically appropriations were received and are allowed under the statute for the future
- Claims Court does not have jurisdiction over cases where contract sued upon cannot be satisfied out of appropriated funds
- “Jurisdiction under the Tucker Act must be exercised absent a firm indication by Congress that it intended to absolve the appropriated funds of the United States from liability for acts of the Comptroller.”
- \Jurisdiction under the Tucker Act must be exercised absent a firm indication by Congress that it intended to absolve the appropriated funds of the United States from liability for acts of the Comptroller.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.