Rigby v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a decision by an unemployment-compensation referee that an employee was terminated for misconduct under § 25-4-78 (3)(c) collaterally estopped the employee from filing a 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 action alleging retaliatory discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).