Riffel v. Dallas & Mavis Forwarding Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because machine was substantially modified after it was delivered, plaintiffs claims were foreclosed under theories of design defect and inadequate warnings
• holding that, because machine was substantially modified after it was delivered, plaintiff's claims were foreclosed under theories of design defect and inadequate warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).