Skip to main content
· 8/30/1995

Rife v. Long

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 143
  • 127 Idaho 841
  • 1995 Ida. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where complaint alleged several theories to prove a claim for negligence, a judgment could not be entered on one of those theories
  • no common-law duty of care when students have been released and parents are free to resume control over their children
  • no common-law duty of care when students have been released and parents are free to resume control over their children
  • where complaint alleged several theories to prove a claim for negligence, a judgment could not be entered on one of those theories
  • “This Court has interpreted the meaning of the word ‘may’ appearing in legislation, as having the meaning or expressing the right to exercise discretion.”
  • “This Court has interpreted the meaning of the word ‘may’ appearing in legislation, as having the meaning or expressing the right to exercise discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, McDevitt, Johnson, Silak, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.