· 8/30/1995
Rife v. Long
Citations
- 908 P.2d 143
- 127 Idaho 841
- 1995 Ida. LEXIS 127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where complaint alleged several theories to prove a claim for negligence, a judgment could not be entered on one of those theories
- no common-law duty of care when students have been released and parents are free to resume control over their children
- no common-law duty of care when students have been released and parents are free to resume control over their children
- where complaint alleged several theories to prove a claim for negligence, a judgment could not be entered on one of those theories
- “This Court has interpreted the meaning of the word ‘may’ appearing in legislation, as having the meaning or expressing the right to exercise discretion.”
- “This Court has interpreted the meaning of the word ‘may’ appearing in legislation, as having the meaning or expressing the right to exercise discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trout, McDevitt, Johnson, Silak, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.