Riess v. A.O. Smith Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that questions “ask[ing] for the ultimate conclusion at law” are inadmissible under V.R.E. 704
• noting that the standard for pleadings must exceed bald contentions and conclusions of law
• admission of expert’s statement that defendant’s negligence was proximate cause of accident was not harmless error, because statement was practically only evidence of causation
• describing the ignition of leaking propane as an explosion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).