Rieff v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “the reasonable efforts requirement has undergone some transformation” because “the family preservation concept. . . was found to be detrimental to children in some cases”
• noting that if the supreme court had thought it “lacked jurisdiction because of standing” in a prior case, the court “could have raised that on [its] own motion, even if it was not an issue before” the court
• “At issue is petitioner’s right of access to the district court, not the merits of his allegations.” (citation omitted)
• “[I]f our court felt we lacked jurisdiction because of standing, we could have raised that on our own motion, even if it was not an issue before us.”
• “[I]f our court felt we lacked jurisdiction because of standing, we could have raised that on our own motion, even if it was not an issue before us.” (citation omitted)
• stating defense could be raised in a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).