Riedlinger v. Hudson Respiratory Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that IWA abrogated retaliatory discharge claim based on whistleblowing
• employee had no right to recovery under the Act where he revealed information only to his employer and not some government or law-enforcement agency
• employee had no right to recovery under the Act where he revealed information only to his employer and not some government or law-enforcement agency
• employee had no right to recovery under the Act where he revealed information only to his employer and not some government or law enforcement agency
• “Where an employee has revealed this information only to his or her employer, there is no cause of action in Illinois for retaliatory discharge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).