Ridsdale v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying abuse-of-discretion standard to district court's determination that prejudicial nature of evidence outweighed its evidentiary value
• when State meets constitutional harmlessness test it necessarily also meets lower statutory harmlessness test as well
• when State meets constitutional harmlessness test it necessarily also meets lower statutory harmlessness test as well
• “An appellate court does not reweigh the evidence, assess the credibility of the witnesses, or resolve conflicting evidence.”
• “An appellate court does not reweigh the evidence, assess the credibility of the witnesses, or resolve conflicting evidence.”
• “[I]t is well established that a conviction for even the gravest offense may be sustained by circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).