Ridley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if a court orders restitution at sentencing or within sixty days thereafter, the court can reserve jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution beyond the sixty-day period
• explaining that if a court orders restitution at sentencing or within sixty days thereafter, the court can reserve jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution beyond the sixty-day period
• holding trial court lacked jurisdiction to order restitution more than sixty days after sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kittelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 5×
• State v. M.M.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-22· cited 1×
• McClintock v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-05· cited 1×
• State v. MM
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-22
• Lawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grice v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-08· cited 15×
• State v. Hiscox
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-16· cited 10×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12· cited 7×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-08· cited 5×