Ridley Sch. Dist. v. M.R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that developer’s retention of common lands showed that “the intent of the [assessment] covenant was to benefit” developer and not “the lot owners in [general]” who therefore lacked authority to enforce it
• waiver may be evidenced by conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).