Ridings v. Riverside Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to answer questions did not constitute FMLA interference due to lack of prejudice
• holding that an employer’s failure to provide notice did not constitute interference because it did not prejudice the employee
• holding no interference because employee did not allege that employer’s failure to provide FMLA infor- mation prejudiced her
• holding no interference because employee did not allege that employer’s failure to provide FMLA infor- mation prejudiced her
• holding no interference because employee failed to allege employer's failure to provide FMLA information prejudiced her
• noting that a plaintiffs “suspicious timing” argument was undercut when the defendant employer had already begun disciplinary action prior to his alleged knowledge of the plaintiffs protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).