· 11/16/1999
Ridings v. Apfel
Citations
- 76 F. Supp. 2d 707
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19470
- 1999 WL 1096988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding case in light of new evidence that “clearly call[ed] into doubt” prior medical reports and the ALJ’s findings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.