Skip to main content
· 11/16/1999

Ridings v. Apfel

Citations

  • 76 F. Supp. 2d 707
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19470
  • 1999 WL 1096988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding case in light of new evidence that “clearly call[ed] into doubt” prior medical reports and the ALJ’s findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.