Ridinger v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Even impairments that are not severe on their own must be considered because the combination of impairments may be severe.\
• \Even impairments that are not severe on their own must be considered because the combination of impairments may be severe.\
• \Even impairments that are not severe on their own must be considered because the combination of impairments may be severe.\
• “When an ambiguity in the evidence must be resolved in order for the ALJ to determine whether the claimant is disabled, the ALJ has a duty to re-contact the medical source for clarification.”
• “Because the scope and severity of the impairments evaluated at Step Two can impact the ALJ’s equivalence determination at Step Three and [the RFC] determination at Step Four, remand is warranted where the ALJ fails to consider the entirety of the evidence at Step Two.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).