· 9/15/2005
Ridgely v. Montgomery County
Citations
- 883 A.2d 182
- 164 Md. App. 214
- 17 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 382
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 198
- 12 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the MCHRA and ADA contain “almost identical” definitions of \disability” and \qualified individual with a disability”
- stating that the MCHRA and ADA contain “almost identical” definitions of “disability” and (Continued
- using decisions interpreting the ADA to interpret provisions of Montgomery County’s discrimination law
- looking to federal decisions interpreting the ADA for guidance in interpreting the MCC
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.