Ridge Petroleum Inc. v. Energy OPS, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court properly excluded “future treatment” evidence from physicians who had not seen plaintiff in two and a half years and did not know her current condition
• medical testimony not helpful to the trier of fact unless \based upon a more probable than not basis\ (citing Carlos v. Cain, 4 Wn. App. 475, 477, 481 P.2d 945 (1971))
• medical testimony not helpful to the trier of fact unless \based upon a more probable than not basis\ (citing Carlos v. Cain, 4 Wn. App. 475, 477, 481 P.2d 945 (1971))
• medical testimony not helpful to the trier of fact unless \based upon a more probable than not basis\ (citing Carlos v. Cain, 4 Wash. App. 475 , 477, 481 P.2d 945 (1971) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).