Skip to main content
· 6/25/1980

Rider v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Citations

  • 270 S.E.2d 288
  • 155 Ga. App. 61
  • 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was no specific notice that the benefits statement was merely a “brief” statement of eligibility, the specifics of which were based upon the insurance group policy, or that the claimant had a right to inspect that policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Deen, Shulman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.