Ridenour v. Sharek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• new trial ordered under no-fault statute where it was undisputed that medical and hospital expenses incurred for diagnostic purposes were reasonably necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Plana v. Sainz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-18· cited 14×
• Blanford v. Polk County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-10· cited 10×
• Hernandez v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-30· cited 10×
• Mason v. DIST. BD. OF BROWARD COLLEGE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-26· cited 9×
• Martin v. Chapman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-02· cited 6×
• Peek v. Stevens
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-25· cited 5×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Brooks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-31· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Keith v. Amrep Corporation
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-05-08· cited 7×
• Banyas v. American Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-19· cited 7×