New Mexico Court of Appeals· 6/2/1995
Ridenour v. Ridenour
Citations
- 901 P.2d 770
- 120 N.M. 352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upheld statute requiring grandparents to make threshold showing family disrupted and to prove visitations in child’s best interests
- upheld statute requiring grandparents to make threshold showing family disrupted and to prove visitations in child's best interests
- no presumption exists that grandparent visitation is in child’s best interests
- constitutional but using rational relation test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flores, Donnelly, Alarid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
- Beagle v. BeagleSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-08-22· cited 130×
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Ruth Anne E.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-01-28· cited 72×
- Graville v. DodgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-01-28· cited 54×
- Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 28×
- In Re Custody of SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2000-03-01· cited 25×
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. Stella P.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-06-22· cited 20×
- Reinhardt v. ReinhardtLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-09-25· cited 18×
- Lucero v. HartNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-09-19· cited 15×
- STATE EX REL. CYFD v. Anne McD.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-02-15· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. McD.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-02-15· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Senaida C.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-11-05· cited 15×
- Berg v. BragdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-06-06· cited 14×
- Hopkins v. WollaberNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-12-28· cited 10×
- Von Eiff v. AzicriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 9×
- D.W. v. B.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-10-01· cited 9×
- Petition of SantoroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-07-16· cited 8×
- French-Hesch v. French-WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-12-09· cited 7×
- Ward v. DibbleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-06· cited 5×
- State Ex Rel. CYFD v. Ruben C.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-07-29· cited 1×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1944-03-27· cited 2,515×
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,904×
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court· 1978-01-18· cited 1,224×
- Brooks v. ParkersonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-03-17· cited 134×
- William Franz v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1983-05-10· cited 87×
- Jaramillo v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-12-24· cited 73×
- Griffin v. StrongTenth Circuit· 1993-01-27· cited 73×
- People Ex Rel. Sibley v. SheppardNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-11-19· cited 70×
- Herndon v. TuheySupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-06-29· cited 66×
- King v. KingKentucky Supreme Court· 1992-07-02· cited 61×
- Rhinehart v. NowlinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-18· cited 56×
- Matter of Adoption of JJBNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 55×
- Clovis National Bank v. HarmonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-12-04· cited 54×
- Vest v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-11-29· cited 51×
- Roberts v. WardSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-04-18· cited 37×
- Jeantete v. JeanteteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-31· cited 36×
- Oldfield v. BenavidezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-01-12· cited 31×
- Sketo v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-09· cited 28×
- Spradling v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-07-14· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.