Ridenhour v. Concord Screen Printers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusivity provision does not bar a claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress based on sexual harassment
• holding that the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act did not bar claims of IIED and NIED against the employer based on the allegation of sexual harassment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).