Riden v. ICI Americas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a manufacturer is not “compelled” to alter a label in the same way that it is “compelled” to comply with a state law or regulation
• “the requirements nevertheless permit labeling variations even among products containing the same active ingredient. Thus, to argue that a (sic) adverse jury award would threaten FIFRA’s policy of uniform labeling belies the truth”
• FIFRA expressly preempts such actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).