Rideau v. Whitley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Supreme Court has stressed that it has never announced mathematical standards for the demonstration of ‘systematic exclusion of blacks but has, rather, emphasized that a factual inquiry is necessary in each case that takes into account all possible explanatory factors.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haley v. City of Boston
  First Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 804×
• Valdez v. Cockrell
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-12-03· cited 337×
• Lorenzo Matthews v. Joseph Abramajtys, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-02-10· cited 220×
• Perez, Ex Parte Alberto Giron
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-08· cited 193×
• United States v. Williams
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-08-30· cited 157×
• Albert Woodfox v. Burl Cain, Warden
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-11-20· cited 44×
• State v. Brooks
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-01-29· cited 22×
• Mosley v. Dretke
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-05-19· cited 17×
• Ex Parte Alberto Giron PEREZ
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-10-08· cited 13×
• State v. Rhea
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-05-19· cited 9×
• State v. Newman
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-07-07· cited 9×
• State v. Divers
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-06-22· cited 8×
• Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke
  W.D. Texas· 2005-09-27· cited 8×
• State v. Rideau
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-11-02· cited 7×
• State v. Williams
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-01-14· cited 7×
• Roy Dumas v. Walter Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-08· cited 2×
• Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
  E.D. Texas· 2014-11-10· cited 2×
• State v. Williamson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2002-01-23· cited 1×
• Valdez v. Cockrell
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-12-26
• Albert Woodfox v. Burl Cain, Warden
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-12-09

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Furman v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
• Witherspoon v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
• Lindh v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
• Washington v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-07· cited 3,450×
• Vasquez v. Hillery
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
• Castaneda v. Partida
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,507×
• Rideau v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 1,211×
• Alexander v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 889×
• Norris v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1935-04-01· cited 711×
• Smith v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1941-01-08· cited 711×
• Whitus v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1966-10-10· cited 696×
• Sumner v. Mata
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 691×
• Rose v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 651×
• Avery v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1953-07-14· cited 541×
• Virginia v. Rives
  Supreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 532×
• Cassell v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1950-04-24· cited 516×
• Neal v. Delaware
  Supreme Court· 1881-05-18· cited 479×
• Lonchar v. Thomas
  Supreme Court· 1996-04-09· cited 438×
• Hill v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 361×