Nevada Supreme Court· 7/21/1980
Riddle v. State
Citations
- 613 P.2d 1031
- 96 Nev. 589
- 1980 Nev. LEXIS 671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that one must make a \contemporaneous objection\ in order to preserve an issue for appeal
- noting that generally a contemporaneous objection is needed to preserve an issue for appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mowbray, Thompson, Manoukian, Batjer, Zenoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BoyleNevada Supreme Court· 1926-07-24· cited 34×
- Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 26×
- Cutler v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 25×
- Barger v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1965-11-09· cited 24×
- Clark v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1973-09-10· cited 22×
- Hayden v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1975-07-23· cited 10×
- Mirin v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1977-02-08· cited 9×
- Williams v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1975-08-26· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.