Skip to main content
· 11/2/1981

Riddle v. Cain

Citations

  • 635 P.2d 394
  • 54 Or. App. 474
  • 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Holding that a county’s authority to buy insurance and notice provisions of a tort claims act have no connection.
  • holding that service by regular mail to the wrong official did not constitute substantial compliance with the notice statute under Brown
  • rejecting a due process challenge to the OTCA notice requirement
  • due process challenge to notice requirement rejected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Thornton, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.