Ricky Smith Pontiac, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that statutory definition of relevant market area “would perplex even the most percipient logician”
• noting that, given the language of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 98(B
• in action for loss of prospective profits, plaintiff must present “specific evidence” that costs would not increase along with revenues
• amendment to statute regulating auto franchises that redefined the “relevant market area” of a franchisee and deleted a provision permitting multiple damages deemed substantive
• “the formula definition [under the 1977 revision] creates a bright-line test that substantively changes the equitable principles standard in the 1970 statute”
• \the formula definition [under the amended statute] creates a bright line test which substantively changes the equitable principles standard in the 1970 statute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).