Skip to main content
· 2/14/1995

Ricks v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

  • 877 F. Supp. 1468
  • 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 233
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2551
  • 1995 WL 88230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the ADA does not require an employer to hire a full-time helper to assist a disabled employee as a reasonable accommodation
  • company was not required to promote employee, nor provide him with a “helper” under reasonable accommodation standard
  • company was not required to promote employee, nor provide him with a “helper” under reasonable accommodation standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lungstrum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.