Skip to main content
· 4/27/2021

Ricks v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the trial court's grant of summary judgment against a rear driver because \conflicting testimony regarding whether the [front driver's] vehicle was properly illuminated\ meant the \negligence issue should have been submitted to the jury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Timothy J. Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.