Rickman v. Rickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Veterans’ Administration disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-03-11· cited 68×
• In Re Marriage of Saslow
  California Supreme Court· 1985-12-31· cited 38×
• Miller v. Miller
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 35×
• Baker v. Baker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-09-26· cited 28×
• Vitko v. Vitko
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-11-16· cited 19×
• Marriage of Strong v. Strong
  Montana Supreme Court· 2000-07-06· cited 17×
• Villasenor v. Villasenor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-07-22· cited 16×
• In Re the Marriage of Kosko
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-03-11· cited 14×
• Sherman v. Sherman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-09-01· cited 10×
• Martin v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-15· cited 7×
• Perras v. Perras
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-04-30· cited 7×
• Dye v. White
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-01-15· cited 6×
• Debra Jean Griffith-Ball v. Stanley Lauren Ball
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2022-05-13

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
• Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-24· cited 209×
• Theresa Milliken v. J. F. Gleason, Jr., in His Capacity as Administrator of Veterans' Affairs
  First Circuit· 1964-05-21· cited 52×
• Ramsey v. Ramsey
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1971-12-17· cited 23×
• Flowers v. Flowers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-02-23· cited 15×
• Steinmasel v. United States
  D. South Dakota· 1962-01-15· cited 12×
• Taylor v. United States
  W.D. Arkansas· 1974-07-02· cited 5×
• Rodulfa v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-24· cited 4×