Ricki Gene Searcy v. Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “there is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for motions to strike motions”
• affirming denial of a motion to strike defendant’s motion to dismiss because “there is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for motions to strike motions and memoranda”
• “[T]here is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for motions to strike motions and memoranda.”
• “[T]here is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for motions to strike motions and memoranda.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).