Skip to main content
· 11/21/2008

Rickert v. Latimore Township

Citations

  • 960 A.2d 912
  • 2008 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 579
  • 2008 WL 4950132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the order of land development and zoning applications is determined by the applicable subdivision and land development ordinance
  • holding that the order of land development and zoning applications is determined by the applicable subdivision and land development plan ordinance
  • holding that approval of a subdivision plan “relates only to subdivision and land development matters and not to zoning matters” and approval of the one “does not extend to any zoning approvals needed to effect the development”
  • explaining that the order of zoning and land development applications depends on the applicable subdivision and land development plan ordinance
  • describing our interpretation as \counter-intuitive” relative to \an appellee [who] asked for a bond at the trial level against a frivolous challenge”
  • “mildly worded advice in the SALDO did not authorize the Supervisors to weave zoning requirements into the final plan review process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini, Judge, and Friedman, Judge, and Leavitt, Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.