Montana Supreme Court· 10/16/1922
Rickards v. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co.
Citations
- 64 Mont. 394
- 210 P. 82
- 1922 Mont. LEXIS 169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the law presumes damages if the pleading sets forth facts showing that plaintiff's legal rights have been violated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper, Farr, Galen, Holloway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Puryer v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'nMontana Supreme Court· 2018-05-18· cited 21×
- Green v. WolffMontana Supreme Court· 1962-06-12· cited 13×
- Doyle v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1936-03-04· cited 10×
- Davenport v. Western Union Tel. Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1932-03-14· cited 2×
- Butte Floral Co. v. ReedMontana Supreme Court· 1922-11-22· cited 2×
- Davenport v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1932-03-14
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ford v. FargasonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1904-07-13· cited 37×
- Bank of British Columbia v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court· 1897-02-11· cited 18×
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1902-04-25· cited 8×
- Loeb v. KamakMontana Supreme Court· 1870-01-15· cited 5×
- Acme Harvesting Machine Co. v. BarkleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1908-12-08· cited 4×
- J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. GidleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-10-03· cited 3×
- Segerstrom v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1908-07-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.