Rickard v. Bornscheuer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting denial of permission to appeal under General Statutes § 54-96 to be reviewable only under an “abuse of discretion” standard
• defendant failed to show how he would be prejudiced by an amendment to the information, pursuant to Practice Book § 623, prior to commencement of trial
• this court has granted state permission to appeal where trial court has abused its discretion
• when “time is not of the essence or [the] gist of the offense, the precise time at which it is charged to have been committed is not material” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• time not element of offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).