Skip to main content
· 2/10/1984

Rick E. Clark, & Cross-Appellee v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a Corporation, & Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 726 F.2d 448
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where assumption of the risk is neither argued nor plead in a FELA case, giving an assumption of the risk withdrawal instruction may be confusing and misleading to a jury
  • allowing for set-off only where plan \explicitly provide[d] that money paid or payable under the FELA decreases the benefits allowable\
  • finding in FELA action that the jury \undoubtedly considered\ the stipulated lost wages in calculating its award to plaintiff and affirming the district court's reduction to avoid double recovery
  • `Cases discussing the issue have generally condemned the giving of an assumption of risk instruction in FELA actions.'
  • \Cases discussing the issue have generally condemned the giving of an assumption of risk instruction in FELA actions.\
  • reaching same result without discussion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Ross, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.